About Logic - Interview with Dana Scott
I'm sure this will be great Scott. Ask Bertrand Russell if you don't believe me. See the centenary talk Scott gave on Strachey and also Scott, D. Some Reflections on Strachey and His Work . Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation 13, 103–114 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010018211714 and Toward a Mathematical Semantics for Computer Languages (1971) by Scott and Strachey. 2:03 From Scott's Strachey centenary talk: Let us now return to λ-calculus and Strachey’s use of it. Christopher told me once that Roger Penrose (now Sir Roger!) suggested to him that he ought to look into using the λ-calculus for the kind of function definitions he wanted to do. At this moment I cannot track down or verify the story. (Perhaps people in Oxford might ask Penrose personally about this?) See Curt Jaimungal Talking With Roger Penrose and the reference Penrose made to S. W. P. Steen's graduate course in Mathematical Logic. In 1973 Steen published a book Mathematical Logic ...