Curt Jaimungal Interview With Robert Spekkens
With an advert for some erectile dysfunction chewing gum, ... for all the cock-bitten men, I guess. My comment : I would love to hear someone explain Bell's theorem as clearly as he explained causal explanations and epistemic quantum states. 46:17 People talk about non-locality as if it is obvious, but epistemic quantum states are inherently non-local: you only know that Alice and Bob's measurements are correlated when you also know that Alice and Bob each indeed do have one of a single pair of entangled particles. Similarly, you can only compare the settings of Alice and Bob's measuring apparatus if you also have some observational procedure for verifying their relative orientations along the paths of the particles, then you also need to know that those paths are in free space and that there is no field which is preparing a different state, and so-on and so-forth. So when Spekkens says that Bell's theorem is a no-go for such-and-such a set of hypotheses then he doesn...