The Surname अमृत
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amrita:
Amrita (Sanskrit: अमृत, IAST: amṛta), Amrit or Amata in Pali, (also called Sudha, Amiy, Ami) is a Sanskrit word that means "immortality". It is a central concept within Indian religions and is often referred to in ancient Indian texts as an elixir. Its first occurrence is in the Rigveda, where it is considered one of several synonyms for soma, the drink of the devas. Amrita plays a significant role in the Samudra Manthana, and is the cause of the conflict between devas and asuras competing for amrita to obtain immortality.
Amrita has varying significance in different Indian religions. The word Amrit is also a common first name for Sikhs and Hindus, while its feminine form is Amritā. Amrita is cognate to and shares many similarities with ambrosia; both originated from a common Proto-Indo-European source.
This poses interesting problems for computer systems security. You can see why someone with that surname might be very interested in, and very good at, the sorts of things discussed at The Centre for History and Economics at King's College, Cambridge. Do the people at Cambridge know this though. Can they talk about it or do the lights go out as soon as you mention it? Is that what secret societies are for? See European History Mid 19th Century.. That was just chaos!
See for example Common Security Forum annual report 2002-2003. I mean, what's holding us back? You just waiting for the CIA to shoot one of these cats so many times that finally everyone is convinced, then what? Open the whole sack of cats? For goodness sake do it!
At 1:09:59
Thinking is concerned with meaning and not with truths, and I believe that it was the error in many metaphysical statements, to believe that the two are the same. And I think that in this respect Kant liberated us: he said that he would distinguish between intellect and reason and so on and show the limitations of reason, of course and knowledge and knowing, in order to make room for faith. I think this was an error. He fell into the old and not so very interesting apparent contradiction between faith and reason, which is very understandable for 18th century thought. What he actually did was to make room for thinking only. The trouble is that nobody has served (?) himself. Nobody has helped, including Kant himself ...
Comments
Post a Comment