Edward Frenkel on Jungian Archetypes in Mathematics

Or maybe it's the other way around? Jung apparently recognised natural numbers as an archetype. He didn't go so far as to recognise Universal Properties as another, but maybe that was just because of a lack of suitable language.


See  Philip Wadler - Propositions as Types, Another Excellent Talk on HoTT by Steve Awodey and the other links in the video description.

Subscribe to Edward Frenkel.

This stuff is all very important if you're God and you're trying to lay down Universal laws of physics so that the Universe is comprehensible to its inhabitants. See Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models.

Subscribe to PBS Space Time.

Anton Petrov on gravitational structures that are hundreds of millions of light-years in size. How do we know this? By making assumptions about observable effects of nuclear physics.

Subscribe to Anton Petrov.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Steven Johnson - So You Think You Know How to Take Derivatives?

Welsh Republic Podcast Talking With Kars Collective on Armenia Azerbaijan Conflict

Daniel Tubbenhauer on The Riemann Hypothesis and Prime Counting