Edward Frenkel on Abstraction
This was a talk he gave on March 13 at the UNESCO International Day of Mathematics 2026.
Subscribe to Edward Frenkel.
See the whole thing here, or here:
Subscribe to IDM.
They didn't invite me, but here's my address:
Abstraction (and the objective nature of mathematics) comes from our abilities as living beings to communicate with each other in language and, most crucially, to be able to talk about language itself, and thereby construct schemes which allow us to describe translations between different ways to describe the same thing. The objective mathematical world that we imagine to be "out there" is in fact something (that same thing we are describing to each other) that emerges from our activities in describing our own communication with each other. So there is in fact just one fundamental mathematical object from which all others are derived. Here is one way to describe it:
RULES <- RULE | RULE ?ws? RULES
RULE <- SYM ?ws? '<-' ?ws? SYMSLIST
SYMSLIST <- SYMS | SYMS ?ws? '|' ?ws? SYMSLIST
SYMS <- SYM | SYM ?ws? SYMS
SYM <- '"' ?notdquote? '"' | "'" ?notsquote? "'" | ?AZs? | '?' ?azAZs? '?'
See Richard Clegg Explaining What's Wrong With Computer Science and Daniel Tubbenhauer on An Unknotter. See also About Logic with Andrej Bauer for a really great example of it happening in real life.
Subscribe to We Plants Are Happy Plants.
Comments
Post a Comment