Firefighting or Planning for a Viable Future

See this post:

My comment:

What if most of the software in use is actually such a load of complete crap that even a stochastic parrot can find more bugs in it in a given interval than people can fix in that interval, even using AI? What if most of the software in use was actually only necessary because of dficiencies in the other tools? Would it still be a good idea to use AI to fix bugs? What if instead you actually concentrated on automatically generating correct code from formal specifications? 

See Economic Madness and The Rather Bubbly US Economy

Subscribe to Cyb3rmaddy

Here are some experts at the Rothschild's rag:

My comment:

Anyone who thinks a "cyber security engineer" is someone who can hack things is not worth listening to.

Subscribe to The Economist

Subscribe to Olive Badger

My comment:

There is another angle which is that the AI bubble is actually all that's stopping the stock markets from doing a 1929 style crash. See Kyla Scanlon's op-ed in the NYT this weekend. She says the top 7 tech stocks are 30% of S&P 500 value, and they're the biggest investors in AI BS too. So that's why even the US treasury is getting in on this marketing scam. It's really a psi-op. 

Subscribe to The Tech Report.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Steven Johnson - So You Think You Know How to Take Derivatives?

Hitachi HD44780U LCD Display Fonts

Using Pipewire to Make A Music Synthesizer