Andy Pitts on Intensional Setoids

From the description:

Roughly speaking, Martin-Löf's dependent type theory comes in two flavours, intensional and extensional. Compared with the second flavour, the first one lacks logical principles such as function extensionality that are taken for granted in mathematics; but it has very good computational properties and (therefore) underlies the various theorem-proving systems implementing dependent type theory. Since Martin Hofmann's PhD work in the late 1990s, we have known that some type-theoretic version of the notion of "setoid" (= set equipped with an equivalence relation) can be used to regain some version of extensional type theory in some version of intensional type theory; but to be more precise, one has to explain the three "some"s in that sentence. I have long avoided thinking about setoids, because the topic is said to be hellish; but one can grow to love most things if one tries! In this talk I will tell you some things I have learned (peering over the shoulders of Hofmann, Altenkirch and Palmgren) about setoids and families of setoids in the simplest form of intensional type theory with universes; and will sketch precisely how they can be used to give a semantics of extensional type theory.

Intensional setoids sound like the kind of condition you could expect to get after passing a three-legged stool. See https://amp12.github.io/IntensionalSetoids/

52:36 This was Andy Pitts' homework, I think: See this talk from six years ago: Maria Emilia Maietti - Quotient completions for topos-like structures

See the paper Elementary quotient completion Maria Emilia Maietti and Giuseppe Rosolini.

She is a colleague of Giovanni Sambin at Padua:




See About Logic interview with Giovanni Sambin.

Subscribe to Topos Institute.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

John Searle's Chinese Room Argument

Tensor Fields and Simplicial Complexes

FUTO FUBS