High-altitude natives are an exceptional model for understanding the genetic and physiological bases of evolutionary adaptation. Species that are broadly distributed across altitudes can provide powerful insight into the genetic basis of high-altitude adaptation, because it is possible to examine segregating variation for phenotypes that may contribute to hypoxia tolerance. Recent research has identified many genes that appear to have experienced selection in high-altitude taxa, including genes thought to be involved in O2 transport, energy metabolism and hypoxia signalling (Simonson, 2015; Simonson et al., 2012; Storz and Cheviron, 2021). However, in most cases, the specific effects of these genetic variants on physiological function are poorly understood. … Identifying these functional effects has the potential to uncover novel and adaptive physiological mechanisms, given the growing appreciation that protein variants can have auxiliary effects that are unrelated to the ‘canonical’ function of the protein in question (Marden, 2013a).
He's fed up with talking about this. I used to have a copy of the little book he wrote called Minds, Brains & Science. Apparently the AI at Google has read it too and gets it completely: How does stuff like this happen? Most people won't even notice what I'm saying even if I point out that the Google search changed the title. The book was really called Minds, Brains & Science , not Minds, Brains & Programs . (But maybe that was a later edition or something?) I asked Google and it said: John Searle's book Minds, Brains and Science did not become "Minds, Brains & Programs"—rather, they are two separate, distinct works published a few years apart: "Minds, Brains, and Programs" (1980): A landmark academic paper published in the journal Behavioral and Brain Sciences. This is where Searle first introduced his famous Chinese Room Argument to challenge the concept of "strong AI". "Minds, Brains and Science" (1984): A shor...
I think this is the first time they've actually publicly announced anything about this project. See these posts: Eron Woolf on Why Open Source is Failing Matt Mikhailov and Vincent McKibbon on The Problem with Open Hardware Jason Kridner talking About BeagleBoard.org and Software Development . See these places: https://danielc.dev/rk/ https://github.com/petabyt/rk https://github.com/futo-org/ret See also https://pine64.org/devices/pinebook_pro/ . Subscribe to FUTO . See https://github.com/nir9/low-level-learning-resources/tree/master/setups/debian . Subscribe to Nir Lichtman . If you're looking for a cool init process, try https://ctx.graphics/terminal/ . See Artful Bytes - When to Use a RTOS and How to Create a Successful Open Source Project .
Comments
Post a Comment